The Ausdance Dame Peggy van Praagh Memorial Address
Presented by Shirley McKechnie for the Australian Association for Dance Education:
Bienniel Conference, Perth, January 7th 1991
Australians making dances: the spatial imperative
It is very fitting that the inaugural Dame Peggy van Praagh Memorial Address
should be delivered at this gathering. We are very close to the first anniversary
of Dame Peggy's death which occurred in Melbourne on the 15th of January last
year. I regard it an honour and a great privilege to be the first in what I
am sure will become a long line of dance artists and scholars who will pay
tribute to Peggy van Praagh in this way.
As most of you know, Dame Peggy was a founding member of the Australian Association
for Dance Education which was established at a National Conference in Melbourne
in 1977. It is not so well known that the seeds of the AADE were first sown
in 1974 at Armidale in northern New South Wales at the University of New
England's Summer School of Dance, where Keith Bain, Warren Lett and I were
members of
the faculty, and Dame Peggy was presiding over one of the celebrated choreographic
workshops. I have written elsewhere 1 of the early influences in her life,
one of which was the master choreographer, Antony Tudor, and another the
pioneer educator of "Summerhill" fame, the great A.S. Neil. It is little wonder that her interest in the development
of young choreographers was equalled by her concern for the promotion of
educational programmes in dance. In the latter part of her working life she
made many contributions
to the growth of tertiary dance studies throughout Australia, notably here
in Western Australia at the Academy of the Performing Arts.
Dame Peggy's life and work have been so well documented since her death that
it is unnecessary for me to repeat the story again. She would have much preferred
to talk about choreographers making dances, especially Australian choreographers
making dances, so much so that I can almost hear her saying "Oh darling, do let's get on with it." So that is what I propose to do.
(Showing of Slides—Images of Australian Dance)
Over the next few days the question "what is Australian dance" will be posed in many ways. We will no doubt seek to define what we mean by
the question as well as make many attempts to answer it. This paper endeavours
to deal with the question of our identity—as Australians who also happen
to be dance artists.
We know that our experience has been shaped by the fact of living in this
land. It is a unique land in every way. Judith Wright, one of our most esteemed
poets,
has remarked, 'For Aborigines, every part of the country they occupied, every
mark and feature, was numinous with meaning.' The spirit ancestors had walked
the land, creating as they went a 'Dreamtime' in which past, present and
future were inextricably entwined—and the land remains invested with their
presence.
Our own reality is different.
No word exists in our language for the complex of earth and sky, water, tree
and spirit-human which is the Aboriginal world. Neither our language nor
our culture permits us to relate to the world in this way and I think we
are all heirs to this western impoverishment of spirit. And yet we know that
in
some ill-defined way we belong also. How else can it be? For some of us it
is an adopted country. Our ancestors now come from the four corners of the
earth, but for all of us it is our shared homeland. Although most of us live
in large cities on it's coastal plains we know that we sit on the doorstep
of a thousand miles of open space.
Our immediate ancestors would have called it empty space. Only artists, it
seems, have been able to give us our bearings. It is a space which Australian
painters have invested with their own mythology, both personal and ancestral.
Patrick White's 'Voss' saw the harshness of it's sticks and stones and rocks
as a metaphor for his own austere spirit. Our film makers, too, have made
it's images readily
available.
I believe that dancers also know it, as they know many things—in their
bones and nerves and muscles. Space is our natural environment: we have more
of it
than almost any other nation on earth.
For several months in 1990 I had the good fortune to travel around Australia
(with the assistance of an Australia Council research grant) in order to
ask a lot of questions of a number of our most distinguished choreographers.
The
answers to these questions are now recorded for posterity and lodged in the
Oral History archives of the National Library in Canberra.
While talking
to the choreographers I also saw many dances, some of them as many as five
times,
and all of them without exception 'Australian Made'. Very few of the choreographers
actually thought of their dances as peculiarly Australian. Certainly there
was a vast range of styles as well as of forms
and contents. It seemed significant to me, however, that the notion of
themselves as ' Australian' artists was pervasive.
So what is it I wondered that makes this so important to us, for I am sure
we can all identify with the sentiment. Let us consider it for a moment
in the light of my comments about the Australian landscape and our relation
to it. Most of us are familiar with the perception of Australian dancers
as consumers
of space, dancers who are at ease with lots of space as dancers of many
other
western nations are not. Every Australian dancer who has spent time overseas
is made aware of this perception very quickly; the comment "you must be an Australian" is made as soon as the dancer is given the opportunity to move. Australians,
it seems, move as if they own the space.
So where does it come from? Is the answer as obvious as the fact that we
invariably have more room in our studios? Perhaps, but then we like the
image, don't we:
it fits our feeling about ourselves, it seems right, and when I think about
it further I remember how my European friends always remark on Australian
skies, the vastness of light and space, the distance of the horizon—and
straight
away we are there, led by our need for an identity, to a mirror which shows
us what we would like ourselves to be; as though our landscape is our chosen
image of ourselves.
When I examine my own feelings about this I know that I still have in my
imagination the wonder of childhood experience in the bush and near the
ocean. I think
this is a common experience for a generation of Australians who grew up
in the thirties and forties as I did. But the choreographers I have studied
tell me much the same story, and their generation is often two decades
younger
than
mine. For many of us, the Australian landscape seems to be both an experienced
reality and a poetic construct, a potent symbol of our spatial predicament;
an unlimited source of powerful metaphors for the satisfactions and frustrations
of our spirits.
Perhaps we will never acquire that deep affinity with the
land which is the heritage of the Aboriginal people. In my mind, however,
there
is no doubt that our imaginations are being shaped by this land in ways
which "we" do not always fully apprehend but which are recognisable to those whose
experience of space is entirely different.
I have commenced this talk with this view of our homeland (or our adopted
country as the case may be) because this is the reality of where we are
and who we
are, a nation of only seventeen million people living on the fringe of
a country the size of Europe. Our preoccupation with space is not an indulgent
fancy:
it is the truth of our daily lives which colours every dance which is made
in Australia. It is the source of our greatest distinction, and the cause
of our major dilemma.
In May of last year when I commenced my research, I had little idea of
the way in which my perceptions would be changed by the journey itself.
In Townsville
where I began, Dance North is a company of only six dancers. The Artistic
Director is also rehearsal director, teacher, promoter, choreographer,
and experienced
ambassador. Her company tours regularly around a huge state and travels
as far as the Pilbara in Western Australia and to Alice Springs, Darwin
and Brisbane,
as well as many places in between. This is an area which is larger than
the rest of Australia put together. Dance North is the only professional
theatre
company north of the Tropic of Capricorn. Cheryl Stock is one of our most
experienced dance artists and her company's current repertoire contains
works by Graeme
Watson, Natalie Weir, Helen Simondson and Cheryl herself.
In contrast to Dance North, Tasdance based in Launceston is practically
in the outer suburbs of Melbourne which it actually manages to visit once
a year.
It's not that Tasdance couldn't find the time or the will to do it more
frequently, it's just that the cost of the journey is prohibitive if Jenny
Kinder, the
artistic director, is to carry out the company's commitment to provide
Tasmania's school children with a quality dance experience—for this takes
most of the
year.
I mention these two small companies which are located nearly three thousand
kilometres apart because they are similar in size and operation. Jenny
and Cheryl have been friends since their meeting at Armidale in 1976 when
Cheryl
danced in a small work created by Jenny for a choreographic showing. I
know that they have never seen the work of each other's companies. The
space which
separates them has become a chasm and the cost of bridging it is not an
option currently available. Undertaking a journey which is greater than
the distance
between London and Moscow is not something one can do on a regular basis.
If either of these companies want to see the work of the Chrissie Parrott
Dance
Collective in Perth, the problem is compounded.
I am aware that in Western Australia, dance people feel that they are deprived
of the stimulation which is available to their peers who live on the east
coast. But for all of us, even those dancers and choreographers who live
in Sydney
or Melbourne, the 'tryanny of distance', as Geoffrey Blainey has so aptly
put it, is a major source of the sense of isolation from which we all suffer.
A person of my age living in New York
all her life as I have done in Melbourne, would by now , have seen all
the major
works of the twentieth century, including those from England and Europe.
Exposure of this kind is something we simply do not have.
In my own experience as a modern choreographer in the sixties I know that
my sense of aloneness was very acute. Those of us working at that time
depended
on the occasional visit of an American company to see what the dances we
were reading about actually looked like. Classical dancers and choreographers
were
better off. A much longer tradition, which included Adeline Genee and Anna
Pavlova, brought the Ballets Russe to Australian cities in the thirties.
Helene Kirsova in Sydney and Edouard Borovansky in Melbourne established
companies
in the early forties. The expressionist dance of central Europe came to
Australia in the thirties also. By 1939 Gertrud Bodenweiser had established
her school
in Sydney, and Hanny Kolm (now Exiner), a member of her company, had joined
her friend Daisy Pirnitzer in Melbourne to teach and perform. It was this
school in Melbourne which introduced me to the new modern dance in 1940.
It is not my intention to turn this paper into a history lesson but I am
endeavouring to note the sources which have provided the major choreographic
inspiration
in this country and how the twin themes of isolation and convergence influence
the way in which our choreographers work.
Few of us in the forties and fifties had the resources to take us overseas.
For an exceptional talent, the ballet world provided more scope, and most
of our early choreographers had their first experiences in London, as did
Robert
Helpmann and later Laurel Martyn and Dorothy Stevenson, who both created
works for the Borovansky Ballet. Laurel Martyn's Ballet Guild, established
in 1946,
eventually became Ballet Victoria and was a major contributor to the growth
of choreographic awareness, at least in Melbourne. Laurel herself created
many significant works which used Australian dancers, designers and musicians
in
ways not previously open to them. The convergence of these various artists
resulted in a kind of "creative broth" and what emerged very quickly was an innovative company with high standards
of performance and a considerable degree of public support. Other pioneers,
like Charles Lisner in Brisbane and Kira Bousloff in Perth, were also choreographers
who created small pockets of creativity, by inclination as well as by necessity.
For modern dancers, the sixties proved to be a kind of coming of age—a decade of growing awareness of compositional techniques. A group of young
dancers
in Sydney, which included Graeme Watson, Chrissie Koltai and Jacqui Carroll,
were beginning to make work, and in 1969 Nannette Hassall won the first
Ballet
Australia choreographic competition and used her prize money to go to America
to study at the Juilliard School in New York. Keith Bain who was both teacher
and mentor to many of the young moderns in Sydney at that time has commented
on the creative ambience which was in evidence among the young dancers
who took classes at the Bodenweiser studios. Similar developments, starting
in 1963, were taking place in Melbourne within Margaret Lasica's Modern
Dance
Ensemble and my own Contemporary Dance Theatre, and in 1965 Elizabeth Dalman,
(now Cameron-Wilson) established her own creative broth in the Australian
Dance Theatre in Adelaide.
It was in the Autralian Ballet, however, that Peggy van Praagh's policy
of developing new Australian choreographers finally began to make a difference
to the 'national' scene. It was here that Garth Welch had his first opportunity
to create a work. Garth has commented on his desire to look at something
had made as opposed to being the passive recipient of other artists'
works,
although he is the first to acknowledge the debt he owes to those who
taught him the elements of the craft. His first work was 'Variations
on a Theme', made in 1964. When he returned from a year's sabbatical
in the USA in 1967 he made 'Othello', a work so admired that it has
been performed by companies throughout Australia ever since.
No account of the development of choreography in Australia could ignore
the influence of Peggy van Praagh. All the choreographers who had contact
with
her during their formative years speak of her interest and her positive
encouragement. What really mattered was that Dame Peggy valued both
the creative process
and the product—a dance which could be interpreted and performed by
dancers. She was interested in the growth of the art form and in the
young artists
who were prepared to work long hours and in difficult circumstances to
make work
for a choreographic showing. In 1971 the results of 'Australian Ballet
Choreographic Workshop' were shown in the Princess Theatre in Melbourne.
Listed in the programme were works by John Meehan, Wendy Walker, Don
Asker, Ian Spink, Graeme Murphy
and Leigh Warren; a creative broth if ever there was one. Meryl Tankard
made
her first work for a similar event only a year or two later.
I believe that the choreographic workshops which were held at the University
of New England in 1974 and 1976 were also seminal events in every sense
of the word. Dancers, choreographers and musicians came from all over
Australia and for the first time, I think, recognised that their experience
as Australians
was important to their development as dance artists. When I tell you
that Garth
Welch, Jacqui Carroll, Ian Spink, Paul Saliba, Julia Cotton, John Meehan,
Rex Cramphorne, and Stephanie St Clair were among those at the 1974
school you
can begin to assess the impact that these artists had on one another,
especially as they all filled the dual role of both dancer and choreographer.
In 1976, the last year of the Armidale Summer Schools, a distinguished
faculty included Peter Brinson, who is to be honoured by the AADE at
this conference
for his contribution to the founding of the organisation. It also included
Norman Morrice, and Martha Hill who was then still directing the Dance
Division of the Juilliard School in New York. Also at Armidale that
summer were a
number of people, who, beginning with Peter Brinson's course in Dance
History and
Criticism, have since made important contributions to the beginnings
of Australian dance Scholarship. But perhaps most significant of all
there
were young dancers
from all over Australia and a number of choreographer-dancers as well.
Two young artists who created enormous interest were Graeme Murphy
and Nannette
Hassall, both in the early stages of their choreographic careers in
1976. Carl Vine was a composer in residence; his first collaboration
with Graeme
Murphy
was on the New England campus. For everyone present the excitement was pervasive.
Fresh ideas came from all directions. The creative broth, New England 1976 was a memorable
one. It bubbled away for a good three weeks.
Both stimulation and transformation then, are at work when artists
converge in this way, and it has seemed important to me to review some
of the
moments in our history when this has occurred. Working in the studio,
as most of
you can testify, brings all our powers into play, knowledge is passed
from body
to body by purely kinesthetic means, lots of talking too... 'how does
it seem to you?' or 'can we try it this way now?' It all seems so common-place
now that we forget that this way of knowing is not always accessible
to others. Many people, like athletes for instance,
use movement as naturally and as easily as a dancer does, but it is
only in dance
that movement can comment on the nature of human experience, a part
of which is the nature of dance itself.
When the ambience is right and artists feel safe to take risks, the
creative ideas begin to flow together and enrich one another. Whenever
this has
happened it seems to me that a confluence of imagination and movement
invention begets
a synthesis which results in a harvest of riches for everyone involved.
I think it is important to remember that a nurturing milieu is one
in which there must
be freedom to fail. If lack of immediate success results in one being
made to feel personally diminished, then it is likely that no more
risks will
be taken, and without risk there is no creativity. This applies whether
the work
is shown in a studio to one's peers or is given a full production for
an audience of two thousand people. Only the most experienced and proven
are
permitted
to fail in this circumstance, and then not very often. It follows that
the apprentice choreographer should be carefully nurtured and not exposed
to unhelpful
or ignorant criticism until the work is mature enough to stand on it's merits.
I have been speaking of some aspects of the creative broth -one of
these is the process with which we are familiar in the guise of the
choreographic
workshop
when the milieu is conducive. Another is the one which operates, when,
in a particular time and place, artists are brought together by circumstances
which
favour their interaction and mutual support. Only in isolated instances
as we have seen, has this happened to any degree in Australia. A relatively
recent
example is the group of artists who worked under the name of ^IDance
Exchange^i in the late seventies. Nannette Hassall, a prime mover in
Dance Exchange
went on to form Dance Works with a group of choreographer-dancers
in Melbourne whose mutual concern was the exploration of new ways of
making
dance works.
Beth Shelton, a foundation member of this group is now one of it's
Artistic Directors. There have of course been others. Kai Tai Chan's One Extra
Company is one which has been commented on at this conference.
Perhaps the best known international example of choreographers who
choose to work in what I have been calling a 'creative brot' is the
group which showed work at the Judson Church in New York from about
1961—1968. One wonders if they would have become quite so famous
if Sally
Banes had not written Terpsichore in Sneakers. Many tertiary
students might
have been spared the conundrums of 'Trio A' if she had been a little
less enthused! One is reminded of another American advocate, the critic
John Martin who invented the term 'modern dance' when he saw the results
of the creative broth being cooked up on the Bennington campus in the
thirties by those three truly awesome ladies, Martha
Graham, Hanya Holm and Doris Humphrey.
In Australia we have no one
great centre like
London or New York or Paris to which all aspiring artists flock.
Nor do we have large populations spread over relatively small areas
as
in Holland and
France, which can provide support for a number of different groups.
With Australia's population around one quarter that of France, and
with a land mass fourteen
times as large, it is clear that the parameters of our experience
are vastly different. In 1990 there were seventeen regional dance
companies
in France,
all funded by a cooperation between the French government, the regions
and the host towns. In addition to these 'choreographic centres',
the Paris Opera Ballet employs one hundred and thirty two dancers
and thirteen apprentice dancers. All these companies are within easy
reach of
one another—at least by Australian standards. The prevailing wisdom
is
that France
is where it is all happening. No wonder! The creative broth must
be on the boil
most of the time.
Well we do have the Australian Ballet, even if it's claim to an Australian
identity has very little to do with dance 'Made in Australia' by
Australian choreographers***(see endnote). Fortunately we also have
the Sydney
Dance Company and the handful of even smaller companies spread around
the coastline from Townsville to Perth on the fringe of three million
square miles of a largely
uncomprehended terrain. 'The typical Australian' says Geoffrey Blainey,
'has never seen the real Outback. He imagines it. That gives the
Outback a firm grip on the minds of people.' Space and distance
then, have shaped our imaginations and our images of ourselves. They
have also shaped the way in which our dance has developed.
Many of our artists feel isolated from the freely available convergence
so natural for artists in other circumstances. Not infrequently,
choreographers
have spoken to me about their love for this country. They also speak
of their hunger for the stimulation they took for granted in Europe
or New York. Most
of our creative artists have felt this need at one time or another,
but for dance artists, the problem is critical. Videos, important
as they are, are
no substitute for the dynamic presence of the dance itself. Instead
of catching a bus to the other side of town ,our artists must
catch a plane to the
other side of a continent. I think that this environment of separation
and isolation over a long period of time has had some significant
results. One
of these is the erosion of confidence in one's own abilities when faced with
what appears to be a superior way of doing things—the typical colonial
cringe. But there are positives too. Our dance artists have been
among the most enthusiastic seekers of knowledge
and cultural stimulation since the 'brain drain' was recognised as
a national problem.
Fortunately for us, most of them came home. What
they have done with this heightened experience in the
past fifteen years has made Australian Dance what it is today.
I am so fascinated by this
phenomenon that I am in the process of writing a book about it.
I believe that both the character and ideology of the American and
European models which have
stimulated our dance artists in recent times have been substantially
modified in this country. Our choreographers have been drawn to
styles
and ways of working
with which they have felt a special kinship, but on coming home
have passed to students and other dancers their own particular interpretations
of these,
coloured as they inevitably are, by both early dance experiences,
and the independence of thought and action which has been the legacy
of an Australian childhood.
The results of this process have been of a quality and diversity
of which we may well be proud, for the new ideas have been filtered through some rather
remarkable talents. Somewhere in this equation the quality of Australian
life and culture is an inevitable factor. While fairly static for
most of our history,
this is now changing very rapidly for all of us, regardless of where
our ancestors were born. Surely one of the major tasks which face
us in this
last decade
of twentieth century dance is to find ways and means of bridging
both the space and distance between practicing dance artists in this
country. We may
speak
of social distance, psychic space or political gaps, but what we
finally mean is that our many and varied cultures do not readily
learn from one another
although the desire and will may well be there. For this we need
as much energy,
determination and vision as we can muster.
I believe that in the
nineties this will be our major challenge. If we continue to turn
our faces exclusively
towards
Europe or America we may just miss noticing the richness of the resources
on our own doorstep. Surely we will have come of age when we choose
to take up
this challenge. I would like to conclude by suggesting that Australia
will have a truly Australian contemporary dance when other cultures
cross the oceans to find
out about it. For this we must continue to be part of the global
culture, but in a way which contributes to it's diversity—by
every means our imaginations
can conceive. In my view, this could be the most exciting, and
perhaps one of the most difficult challenges we have ever faced.
If we can
ensure that
a share of our national resources, imaginative as well as material,
are directed towards the making of our own creative broth, we may
just find that we have
transformed our spatial imperative into a spatial option.
Notes
- Shirley McKechnie, 'Dame Peggy van Praagh' in Dance Australia,
No.7. March 1982
- Judith Wright, 'Landscape and Dreaming' in Australia: The Daedalus
Symposium (Sydney: Angus and Robertson, 1985) p.32.
- Keith Bain has spoken about this period in Sydney in the Oral
History now lodged with the National Library of Australia.
- Oonagh Duckworth, 'France: Outside Paris' in Bent Schonberg, ed., World
Ballet and Dance 1989-1990 (London: Dance Books, 1989) p. 119-121.
- Geoffrey Blainey, 'Australia: A Bird's-Eye View' in Australia: The Daedalus
Symposium, (Sydney: Angus and Robertson, 1985) p.8-9.
*** Note added 7
November 1998
This comment reflected general perceptions about the content of the Australian
Ballet’s repertoire at that time. Since 1992 much has been done to
encourage the development of Australian choreographers and this is reflected
in
the current repertoire.
|